Re: New BK License Problem?

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 17:45:29 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:26:41PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> > How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry about
> > renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.
>
> Would you suggest sending 2.4 and 2.6 changesets to the same 'stable' list
> or making a new one for each release? I'd suggest the latter option,
> hence making the naming explicit from the start.

Good point.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST