* Tony Glader (Tony.Glader@blueberrysolutions.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > > In this case capable() call has been made from a kernel module. I think a
> > The userspace task that called the ioctl() is the one to look at.
>
> ...
>
> > > CapInh: 0000000000000000
> > > CapPrm: 00000000fffffeff
> > > CapEff: 00000000fffffeff
> >
> > Ok, I don't think the capable() check is failing.
>
> So though me too, but now we are getting to the point - capable() check
> fails! How that can be possible?
You could dump something like this before the capable() call:
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s:(%d) eff: 0x%x\n", current->comm, current->pid,
cap_t(current->cap_effective));
-chris
-- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST