Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> But there is a good reason why they do it.
> Take a look at dirvers/video/Config.in for example.
> See the size of the big if's. They span several pages if not the whole file.
> Why they do this is simple. Only check for PCI once, and group all
> PCI stuff there.
> With the syntax Roman propose we see instead that _each_ config option
> check for PCI. Which is good IMHO.
That falls apart for multiple-bus drivers.
The way the current config files handle this seems reasonable... for
example drivers/net/ in fact _already_ splits things up by bus type to
some extent. But this is not a hard and fast rule, just easing some pain.
> But the whole argumentation boils down to something rahter simple:
> 1) Shall we group configuration files together
> 2) Shall we group related files together
This reminds me of another point:
An eventual goal is for people, mostly initial driver merges or vendors,
to be able to add a simple driver without patching _any_ files.
Which implies that the equivalent of "source drivers/net/Config*"
(wildcarding) in Roman's system would be useful. Or maybe "source
drivers/net" and it knows that when given a directory it should scan for
all Config* files in that dir.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST