Re: PROBLEM: Interface address change netlink socket problem.(Patch attached)

From: Vividh Siddha (vividh@ipinfusion.com)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 17:33:09 EST


When you give
ifconfig eth0 10.10.10.50 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.10.255

It first calls devinet_ioctl() with cmd as SIOCSIFADDR. In this we reset
netmask and broadcast address.

When devinet_ioctl() is called with SIOCSIFBRDADDR, the check for old
address and new address suceeds as we changed the broadcast
address(whereas it is unchanged). This then calls inet_del_ifa(delete
notification) and then inet_insert_ifa(add notification).

Similarly when devinet_ioctl() is called with SIOCSIFNETMASK.

I tested this with the netlink socket with the patch applied and it
works as expected.

Thanks,
vividh

David S. Miller wrote:
> Can you explain how not initializing some fields of the 'ifa'
> prevents the extra netlink messages? I don't understand how
> your patch works.
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST