On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:24:38PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:29:02 +0100
>
> There are areas where the TAHI tests expect a certain behaviour
> when more than one behaviour is acceptable.
>
> Great, that's what I was trying to find out.
>
> Now I just need to know if this link-local prefix case
> is one such issue. :-)
That I can't answer, since I've not had that one specifically thrown at
me as a test failure condition.
However, in a previous email I did indicate the two different ICMPv6
errors that could be generated. So I guess it's a case of see if this
was a TAHI failure, and if so then is it that TAHI want's to get a
'no route to destination' when 'address unreachable' should suffice.
DF
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:34 EST