re: [PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 5

From: Dan Kegel (dank@kegel.com)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 19:42:47 EST

Next message: Yuji Sekiya: "Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op?"
Maybe in reply to: george anzinger: "[PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

My company needs the high-res-timers functionality, and
we and others are starting to port it to ppc for 2.4.
>From there it ought to be easy to drop the ppc specific part
into 2.5 -- assuming the generic part makes it into 2.5.
Anyone know how Linus feels about the patch?

- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Yuji Sekiya: "Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op?"
Maybe in reply to: george anzinger: "[PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:35 EST