Re: Fork timing numbers for shared page tables

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 15:02:40 EST

Next message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: Oops with?2.5.40"
Previous message: Matt D. Robinson: "[PATCH] 2.5.41: lkcd (2/8): dump notifier"
In reply to: Dave McCracken: "Fork timing numbers for shared page tables"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Fork timing numbers for shared page tables"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 02:59:07PM -0500, Dave McCracken wrote:
> I ran this test in three cases, 2.5.41, 2.5.41-mm2 without share, and
> 2.5.41-mm2 with share.
> Now for the results (all times are in ms):

Hrm, it'd be nice to see how nicely this does things for things like
500GB-sized processes on 64-bit boxen...

Any chance you could pass this test along for randomized benchmark
type stuff?

Thanks,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: Oops with?2.5.40"
Previous message: Matt D. Robinson: "[PATCH] 2.5.41: lkcd (2/8): dump notifier"
In reply to: Dave McCracken: "Fork timing numbers for shared page tables"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Fork timing numbers for shared page tables"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:38 EST