> > > Should EVMS be included, the team will make it our top priority to
> > > resolve the disputed design issues. If the ruling should be that some of
> > > our design decisions must change, so be it, we will comply. Certainly
> > > some changes can not be done by the 20th or 31st, however I feel
> > > the team can handle most changes before 2.6 ships.
> >
> > Thats good to hear. Right now the debate appears to be - "users: please
> > add EVMS" "hackers: oh my god no" - so you got the feature set right it
> > seems
>
> Obvious point:
>
> * Linus can always thaw the tree after 31st just for one addition, if
> something _really_ needs to be added for 2.6
Beside EVMS there is another one: Reiser4
Getting such an FS "for free" is worth it.
http://www.namesys.com/v4/v4.html
Hans, can you please send a summary of the "new" FS limits?
PB/EB, etc.? ;-)
Regards,
Dieter
-- Dieter Nützel F&E Leiter WEAR-A-BRAIN GmbH Email: d.nuetzel at wearabrain.de (replace at with @) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:44 EST