[Benchmark] Contest 0.51

• Next message: Tom Vier: "2.4.19 OOM killer triggered"
• Previous message: Kevin Brosius: "Re: Hello all, I don't believe has been reported yet. While 'make bzImage' for 2.5.41-ac2 , I receieved the following error: net/built-in.o: In function `llc_init': net/built-in.o(.text.init+Re: 2.5.41-ac2 : llc_proc_exit undefined"
• Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: [Benchmark] Contest 0.51"
• Maybe reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [Benchmark] Contest 0.51"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all,
here the contest results:

noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 128.8 97 0 0 1.01
2.5.40 [3] 134.4 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.40-nopree [3] 133.7 96 0 0 1.04
2.5.41 [3] 136.5 96 0 0 1.07
2.5.41-mm2 [3] 134.8 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.42 [3] 134.8 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.42-mm2 [3] 135.5 96 0 0 1.06

process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 194.1 60 134 40 1.52
2.5.40 [3] 184.5 70 53 31 1.44
2.5.40-nopree [3] 286.4 45 163 55 2.24
2.5.41 [3] 192.6 68 59 32 1.50
2.5.41-mm2 [3] 193.4 66 68 34 1.51
2.5.42 [3] 187.6 68 58 32 1.46
2.5.42-mm2 [3] 186.0 69 60 31 1.45

io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 461.0 28 46 8 3.60
2.5.40 [3] 293.6 45 25 8 2.29
2.5.40-nopree [3] 269.4 50 20 7 2.10
2.5.41 [3] 342.7 41 34 9 2.68
2.5.41-mm2 [3] 251.1 54 21 8 1.96
2.5.42 [3] 304.5 45 28 9 2.38
2.5.42-mm2 [3] 254.6 53 20 8 1.99

It seems useful to me add a colum with CPU%+LCPU%.
It is intersting to notice that 2.5.41 spend 41+9=50% CPU time
for compiling and for the io_load while 2.5.42 spend 45+9=54%
time. Can I say that 2.5.42 is "better" than 2.5.41 ?

read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.42 [3] 162.3 82 10 4 1.27
2.5.42-mm2 [3] 162.5 82 10 4 1.27

No difference here.

list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.42 [3] 154.2 85 0 6 1.20
2.5.42-mm2 [3] 155.1 85 0 6 1.21

No difference here.

mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 161.1 80 38 2 1.26
2.5.40 [3] 163.0 80 34 2 1.27
2.5.40-nopree [3] 161.7 80 34 2 1.26
2.5.41 [3] 161.0 83 33 2 1.26
2.5.41-mm2 [3] 229.9 57 35 1 1.80
2.5.42 [3] 157.9 83 33 2 1.23
2.5.42-mm2 [3] 162.2 81 33 2 1.27

No difference here.

Comments ?

                Paolo
                
                

-- 
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org 
Powered by Outblaze
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Tom Vier: "2.4.19 OOM killer triggered"
• Previous message: Kevin Brosius: "Re: Hello all, I don't believe has been reported yet. While 'make bzImage' for 2.5.41-ac2 , I receieved the following error: net/built-in.o: In function `llc_init': net/built-in.o(.text.init+Re: 2.5.41-ac2 : llc_proc_exit undefined"
• Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: [Benchmark] Contest 0.51"
• Maybe reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [Benchmark] Contest 0.51"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:44 EST