From: "Joseph D. Wagner" <wagnerjd@prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 02:49:55 -0500
> But there is no fundamental reason for that, we just haven't
> gotten around to threading that bit yet.
Oh yes there is. What if an allocation of blocks and/or inodes is
preempted? Another thread could attempt to allocate the same set of
blocks and/or inodes.
That's why we protect the allocation with SMP locking primitives
which under Linux prevent preemption.
This isn't rocket science, the IP networking is fully threaded for
example and I consider that about as hard to thread as something like
ext2/ext3 inode/block allocation.
Also, as Andi Kleen noted, it's actually filesystem dependant whether
the inode/block allocation is threaded or not.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:45 EST