From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
[...]
> run this version I'd like to see the result. I believe I had to use the
> "-l" patch option to ignore blank mismatches to get this to work, and I've
> cleaned up another mailing funny as well.
Hi Bill,
here the results agains 2.5.41-mm2C (2.5.41-mm2 + Con patch "vmscan.c")
Starting 1 CPU run with 250 MB RAM, minimum 5 data points at 20 sec intervals
_____________ delay ms. ____________
Test low high median average S.D. ratio
noload 113.648 114.508 113.707 113.861 0.000 1.000
smallwrite 116.054 180.420 117.924 130.525 0.028 1.146
largewrite 114.019 179.770 120.451 134.021 0.028 1.177
cpuload 106.590 162.893 107.075 118.080 0.025 1.037
spawnload 106.574 164.898 107.490 118.671 0.026 1.042
8ctx-mem 7767.843 16917.625 8994.265 10906.788 3.844 95.790
2ctx-mem 6515.450 18273.101 10344.575 11217.755 4.822 98.521
8ctx-mem and 2ctx-mem show "bad" performance.
Do you think is it possible to apply the patch on the top of 2.5.42-mm2 ?
Ciao,
Paolo
-- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.orgPowered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:46 EST