Evolution and 2.5.x

• Next message: Russell King: "Re: Watchdog drivers"
• Previous message: Pavel Machek: "in_atomic() & spin_lock / spin_unlock in different functions"
• Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: Evolution and 2.5.x"
• Reply: Robert Love: "Re: Evolution and 2.5.x"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Greetings,
 
  I'm guessing that not too many of the kernel developers use Evolution as
their email program :) Since I started picking up the 2.5.x series, at around
2.5.34, Evolution does not run anywhere near properly. I'm not sure if that
is a kernel issue, or a problem with Evolution's code.. But it did improve
quite a bit with all the low-level process management that was in the 2.5.3x
series. It still doesn't work right though. (in 2.5.34, evolution would
just plain halt the system ... in 2.5.42, it mostly works right, as long
as you don't try to compose a message.. composing a message will leave you
with a whole buch of zombie processes).
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Russell King: "Re: Watchdog drivers"
• Previous message: Pavel Machek: "in_atomic() & spin_lock / spin_unlock in different functions"
• Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: Evolution and 2.5.x"
• Reply: Robert Love: "Re: Evolution and 2.5.x"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:46 EST