On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 14:38, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I'm doing spin_lock_irqsave() then in another function
> spin_unlock_irqrestore. Is that okay? If no, can it cause "scheduling
> in atomic"?
It is not OK if the function is run by a different process. Then one
process will have a preempt_count one larger than it should and one
would have a preempt_count one smaller.
The task with the one smaller preempt_count will probably cause a crash
when it preemptively reschedules erroneously.
In other words, you have:
Process A Process B
preempt_count++
preempt_count--
When both of those routines need to be done by the same process.
Also, you cannot use spin_lock_irqsave() in different functions at all
on sparc as it contains stack information.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:47 EST