On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 15:24, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> linux-2.5.42 had an annoying new behavior. When I would
> try to do a warm reboot, it would spin down the hard drives, which
> just made the reboot take longer and gave the impression that a
> halt or poweroff was in progress.
>
> At first, I suspected IDE, but I think the new behavior in IDE
> of spinning down the hard drives on suspend is correct. The problem
> is that the warm reboot system call is trying to suspend all of the
> devices before a warm reboot for no reason. We already have a reboot
> notifier chain that drivers can use to register code that has to be
> run in order to safely reboot or halt. I am not talking about
> eliminating that. I am only talking about the soft reboot putting
> devices into a power saving mode that is allowed to take a long
> recovery time, especially given that the reboot is likely to want to
> talk to every hardware device connected to the system.
>
> Anyhow, here is the patch. As far as I can tell, there is no
> delegated mainainer for kernel/sys.c, so I am sending this to
> linux-kernel and I will resend it to Linus later if nobody points me
> to another maintainer to go through and there are no complaints.
Adam,
I'm not sure the proper thing to do is necessarily remove the
device_shutdown() call. I did the changes to the device_shutdown()
function, but as far as I can tell, it should not have changed any
behavior like that - all I did was re-work the logic a bit. In any
case, what I did submit to the mailing list was absent a small piece of
code (a change to device.h), and the person who forwarded it onto Linus
(thank you!) did make a change to make it compile without that.
Please try this patch to the base 2.5.42 code, and let me know if this
returns it to the previous behavior?
--- a/drivers/base/power.c Sat Oct 12 00:22:11 2002
+++ linux/drivers/base/power.c Sun Oct 13 15:42:46 2002
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
struct device * prev = NULL;
int error = 0;
- if(level == SUSPEND_POWER_DOWN)
+ if(level == SUSPEND_SHUT_DOWN)
printk(KERN_EMERG "Shutting down devices\n");
else
printk(KERN_EMERG "Suspending devices\n");
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
if (dev) {
spin_unlock(&device_lock);
if(dev->driver) {
- if(level == SUSPEND_POWER_DOWN) {
+ if(level == SUSPEND_SHUT_DOWN) {
if(dev->driver->remove)
dev->driver->remove(dev);
} else if(dev->driver->suspend)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
*/
void device_shutdown(void)
{
- device_suspend(4, SUSPEND_POWER_DOWN);
+ device_suspend(4, SUSPEND_SHUT_DOWN);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_suspend);
--- a/include/linux/device.h Sat Oct 12 00:22:19 2002
+++ linux/include/linux/device.h Sun Oct 13 15:43:03 2002
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
SUSPEND_SAVE_STATE,
SUSPEND_DISABLE,
SUSPEND_POWER_DOWN,
+ SUSPEND_SHUT_DOWN,
};
enum {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:47 EST