From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
[...]
> > Do you think is it possible to apply the patch on the top of 2.5.42-mm2 ?
>
> I haven't tried it yet, but I'm interested in your result, since my
> 2.5.41-mm2v result was actually better then plain -mm2. I am just building
> some new test stuff on an SMP machine so I can compare uni and SMP
> performance under load, and I'll look at 2.5.42 tonight or tomorrow.
Well, I did't run the test against 2.5.41-mm2, I'll do it just to compare the result with 2.5.42-mm2+vmscan patch.
> My reference machine was a 96MB machine, if you're really curious about
> this you could boot with mem=96m (or 128m) and rerun the test. In any case
> I have the kids tonight, if I get some time I'll try it, otherwise
> tomorrow.
Ok, I'll try to find the time to run the test against 2.5.42 and 96 or 128MiB of Ram.
Paolo
-- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.orgPowered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:49 EST