On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:36:22AM +0200, DervishD wrote:
> Well, the attachments included (unified diff format), is the patch
> against both 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-pre10 (I've changed the kernel name
> directory part to '/usr/src/linux/' so it's applicable to both
> versions.
You could try sending a patch that conforms to the following (why don't
we include a comment about this in Documentation/SubmittingPatches?)
This would remove an extra reason why your patch may not have been
accepted.
PATCH(1) PATCH(1)
NAME
patch - apply a diff file to an original
...
NOTES FOR PATCH SENDERS
There are several things you should bear in mind if you
are going to be sending out patches.
...
If the recipient is supposed to use the -pN option, do not
send output that looks like this:
diff -Naur v2.0.29/prog/README prog/README
--- v2.0.29/prog/README Mon Mar 10 15:13:12 1997
+++ prog/README Mon Mar 17 14:58:22 1997
because the two file names have different numbers of
slashes, and different versions of patch interpret the
file names differently.
Content-Description: mmap.c.diff
> --- /usr/src/linux/mm/mmap.c.orig 2002-10-14 11:16:40.000000000 +0200
> +++ /usr/src/linux/kernel/mm/mmap.c 2002-10-14 11:19:32.000000000 +0200
Also, you should generate the patches without the "/usr/src/" prefix.
So it should look like this:
--- linux/mm/mmap.c.orig 2002-10-14 11:16:40.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/mm/mmap.c 2002-10-14 11:19:32.000000000 +0200
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:49 EST