Re: cdrom_sysctl_register uses LOTS of CPU, and no cdrom is attached (2.4.20-pre10)

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 04:42:00 EST

Next message: Jaroslav Kysela: "Re: ALSA update"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [BK PATCHS] fbdev updates."
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: cdrom_sysctl_register uses LOTS of CPU, and no cdrom is attached (2.4.20-pre10)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 15 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 October 2002 07:07, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > > attached is the .config and these three readprofile output files
> > > (pro[123]). see time to see the interval they have been created in
> >
> > These look like bungled up profiles of the magnitude that even i couldn't
> > conjure up ;)
>
> excuse me?
> made a new one now.
>
> why is cdrom_sysctl_register using all that cpu??? I mean - it's got nothing
> there to do!

come on, the profile data is obvious bogus. take a look at
cdrom_sysctl_register(), for chrissake.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jaroslav Kysela: "Re: ALSA update"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [BK PATCHS] fbdev updates."
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: cdrom_sysctl_register uses LOTS of CPU, and no cdrom is attached (2.4.20-pre10)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:54 EST