Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq

From: Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy (maxk@qualcomm.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 11:34:02 EST


At 05:57 AM 10/15/2002 +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
>Hello!
>
> > But yes, i agree, and there are a number of other
> > renames that would make perfect sense.
>
>Oh, do you dislike names with history? I love them. :-)
>Well, bh is short, looks nice and cryptic enough.
>
>After true BHs have gone, just say that "bh" is alias for "softirq".
Sure. Just like I said we can keep compatibility defines
         #define local_bh_disable local_softirq_disable

But primary interface should be changed IMO.

Max

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:55 EST