Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5

From: Dan Kegel (dank@kegel.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 12:18:35 EST

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: unhappy with current.h"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Next in thread: Lincoln Dale: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Reply: Lincoln Dale: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:06:22AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Doesn't the F_SETSIG/F_SETOWN/SIGIO stuff qualify as a scalable
> > alternative?
>
> No.

What's the worst part about it? The use of the signal queue?
- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: unhappy with current.h"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Next in thread: Lincoln Dale: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Reply: Lincoln Dale: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:55 EST