Re: [PATCH] Summit support for 2.5 - now with subarch! [4/5]

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 12:32:19 EST


>> That's pretty pointless for one variable. I think you're taking things
>> to ridiculous extremes.
>
> OK, I agree that a single .c file for one variable is very extreme. I think
> you also would agree with me that if it had been ten variables and an exported
> function then it should live in a separate .c file in the summit specific code.

Yup.
 
> If you can promise me that summit will never need an extra variable or
> exported function as the code evolves from now until the end of the
> architecture then I can live with summit_x86 in the main line.

I don't think it'll ever need it, but if it does, I'll create it ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:56 EST