Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 12:50:48 EST

Next message: Joe Thornber: "[PATCH] Device-mapper submission 5/7"
Previous message: Shailabh Nagar: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
In reply to: Shailabh Nagar: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:38:53PM -0400, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> So I guess the question would now be: whats keeping /dev/epoll from
> being included in the kernel given the time left before the feature freeze ?

We don't need yet another event reporting mechanism as /dev/epoll presents.
I was thinking it should just be its own syscall but report its events in
the same way as aio.

-ben

-- 
"Do you seek knowledge in time travel?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joe Thornber: "[PATCH] Device-mapper submission 5/7"
Previous message: Shailabh Nagar: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
In reply to: Shailabh Nagar: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:56 EST