Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test

From: Paolo Ciarrocchi (ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 14:15:45 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "[RFC] iovec in ->aio_read/->aio_write"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>
> > Hi Bill,
> > I'm back with the results of others tests, here all my results:
>
> Thanks, I'll cip them in the response, but this test sure does make some
> kernels unhappy, doesn't it? And the sad truth is that this isn't
> artifact, if you get a similar "real load" on the machine the response
> will be really unusable in real life.
Yeah, but it also means that 2.5.42-mm2 is the winner, and I have the same feeling just using it, so I think we'll see a 2.5.43 very responsive ;-)

Did you try 2.5.42-mm3 ?

Ciao,
Paolo

-- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org

Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "[RFC] iovec in ->aio_read/->aio_write"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:56 EST