Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq

From: Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy (maxk@qualcomm.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 14:24:18 EST


At 10:44 AM 10/15/2002 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: "Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy" <maxk@qualcomm.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:02 -0700
>
> But primary interface should be changed IMO.
>
>I totally disagree.
Care to explain why ?

>Keep _bh, it's cool.
But pretty much meaningless. _softirq on the other hand clearly shows what
it does.
We don't give names to a functions based on the coolness, do we ? ;-)

btw _si would be equally cool.

Max

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:56 EST