Re: sendfile(2) behaviour has changed ?

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Wed Oct 16 2002 - 05:25:08 EST

Next message: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "[BUG] 2.5.43 IDE not powered down on shutdown"
Previous message: Jeff Dike: "Re: [uml-devel] UML and 2.5.43"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: sendfile(2) behaviour has changed ?"
Next in thread: James Antill: "Re: sendfile(2) behaviour has changed ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:59:35AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> It has only been intended for output to a TCP stream socket.
>
> To be honest, I'm not so sure about this.

The old manpage did not state this properly. In November 2000 I tried to use
sendfile as recvfile and discovered that it did not work. The ensuing
discussion led to the modification of the manpage to state that it would
only write to a socket and only read from a pagecache backed fd.

Regards,

bert hubert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk                              the dot in .tk
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "[BUG] 2.5.43 IDE not powered down on shutdown"
Previous message: Jeff Dike: "Re: [uml-devel] UML and 2.5.43"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: sendfile(2) behaviour has changed ?"
Next in thread: James Antill: "Re: sendfile(2) behaviour has changed ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST