re: [patch] sys_epoll ...

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Date: Mon Oct 21 2002 - 12:10:02 EST


On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Davide wrote:
> >asmlinkage int sys_epoll_create(int maxfds);
> >asmlinkage int sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd, unsigned int events);
> >asmlinkage int sys_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct pollfd **events, int timeout);
>
> Hey Davide,
> I've always been a bit bothered by the need to specify maxfds in
> advance. What's the preferred way to handle the situation
> where you guess wrong on the value of maxfds? Create a new
> epoll and register all the old fds with it? (Sounds like
> a good job for a userspace wrapper library.)

I'm currently looking at doing it automatically, w/out the need of
specifying it. I don't like it either ...

> Regardless, thanks for pushing /dev/epoll along towards inclusion
> in 2.5. I'm looking forward to seeing it it integrated.
> Even if the interface doesn't please everyone, the performance
> should...

You should thank Hanna Linder that bugged Linus way more than I did :)

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:54 EST