Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 22 2002 - 14:57:30 EST

Next message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:47:39PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Monday 21 October 2002 06:22, Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
> > Also, are initramfs, ext2/3 resize for 2.7/3.1?
>
> The online resize stuff has been suffering because I've been terribly
> busy at work. Even so, it can be merged after the 2.5 code freeze,
> since it is internal to ext3 and does not affect any APIs.

Nevertheless, it means any ext3 stability testing done post-freeze
would be invalidated by addition of a new _feature_.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 21, 2002"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:00 EST