Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 07:02:18 EST

Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [ACPI] Re: 2.5.44: How to decode call trace"
Previous message: Russell Coker: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
In reply to: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
Next in thread: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
Reply: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 16:36, Osamu Tomita wrote:
> IORESOURCE98_SPARSE flag means odd or even only addressing.
> We modify check_region(), request_region() and release_region().
> If length parameter has negative value, addressing is sparse.
> For example,
> request_region(0x100, -5, "xxx"); gets 0x100, 0x102 and 0x104.

Does PC-9800 ever have devices on 0x100/2/4/8 overlapping another device
on 0x101/103/105 ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [ACPI] Re: 2.5.44: How to decode call trace"
Previous message: Russell Coker: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
In reply to: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
Next in thread: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
Reply: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:03 EST