Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 08:48:31 EST

Next message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?"
Previous message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c"
Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c"
Reply: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 14:17, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> +#if SIGRTMIN > 32
> +#define M(sig) (1ULL << (sig))
> +#else
> #define M(sig) (1UL << (sig))
> +#endif

Not >= ??

otherwise it looks very sensible

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?"
Previous message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c"
Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c"
Reply: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:03 EST