Re: highres timers question...

From: george anzinger (george@mvista.com)
Date: Sat Oct 26 2002 - 04:07:44 EST

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels"
Previous message: Marc Giger: "cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) for this processor not (yet) available"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "highres timers question..."
Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: Crunch time -- the musical. (2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rob Landley wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that of the patches here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers
>
> The -posix one adds posix support on top of the base high-res timers patch?
>
> (Did I guess right?)

Uh, no. We made the command decision that even IF he does
not let in the high-res stuff we would like the POSIX API in
the kernel. Thus the patches are structured to require the
POSIX patch first. This can be changed if need be, but that
is the way it is now.
>
> Rob
>
> --
> http://penguicon.sf.net - Terry Pratchett, Eric Raymond, Pete Abrams, Illiad,
> CmdrTaco, liquid nitrogen ice cream, and caffienated jello. Well why not?

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels"
Previous message: Marc Giger: "cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) for this processor not (yet) available"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "highres timers question..."
Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: Crunch time -- the musical. (2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:30 EST