Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC

• Next message: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: [2.5. PATCH] cpufreq: correct initialization on Intel Copperm ines"
• Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: [parisc-linux] Untested port of parisc_device to generic device interface"
• In reply to: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC"
• Next in thread: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, J.E.J. Bottomley wrote:

> The CONFIG_X86_PIT was something I added to try to clarify. There are three
> cases with this:
>
> PIT y, TSC n: Never use TSC, always use PIT
> PIT y, TSC y: Try TSC at first, if it doesn't work, fall back to PIT
> PIT n, TSC y: TSC always works, use it without testing.
>
> Obviously PIT n, TSC n is bogus.

<n00b> How does one go about building a kernel with PIT y and TSC y ? My
current kernels obviously are incapable of disabling the TSC </n00b>

        Zwane

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: [2.5. PATCH] cpufreq: correct initialization on Intel Copperm ines"
• Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: [parisc-linux] Untested port of parisc_device to generic device interface"
• In reply to: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC"
• Next in thread: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST