On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 01:22:51PM -0500, Akira Tsukamoto wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:56:52 +0100
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> mentioned:
> >
> > You don't seem to save/restore the FPU state, so it will be likely
> > corrupted after your copy runs.
>
> This is the main question for me that I was wondering for all week.
> My first version was using fsave and frstore, so
> just changing three lines will accomplish this.
> Is it all I need? Any thing elase needed to consider using fpu register?
You are currently corrupting the user's FPU state.
The proper way to save it is to use kernel_fpu_begin()
> >
> > Also I'm pretty sure that using movntq (= forcing destination out of
> > cache) is not a good strategy for generic copy_from_user(). It may
> > be a win for the copies in write ( user space -> page cache ),
>
> Yes, that why I included postfetch in the code because movntq does not leave
> them in the L2 cache.
That looks rather wasteful - first force it out and then trying to get it in
again. I have my doubts on it being a good strategy for speed.
> > but
> > will hurt for all the ioctls and other things that actually need the
> > data in cache afterwards. I am afraid it is not enough to do micro benchmarks
> > here.
>
> check above?
Use special function calls for them, don't put it into generic
copy_*_user
Also you should really check for small copy and not use the FPU based
copy for them. Best is probably to use a relatively simply copy_*_user
(no FPU tricks, just an unrolled integer core) and change the VFS
and the file systems to call a special function from write(), but only
when the write is big.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:17 EST