On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:53:32AM -0600, Eli Carter wrote:
> Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 11:31:04PM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> >
> >>David S. Miller wrote:
> >>
> >>>What is so difficult about allowing anyone to review and close a bug?
> >>
> >>Does Buzilla have some "undo everything Jerry Erk did recently"
> >>feature ? If not, the incompetent and the practical jokers might
> >>become a problem.
> >
> >
> >There's a good example extant where this isn't a problem: Wikipedia.
> >In their example, vandalism increases, but so does clean-up. Dave's
> >idea lets us scale the number of Bugzilla janitors. We won't get
> >perfect scaling, but it's much better than not scaling.
> >
>
> Changes to wiki's are version controlled, with links to those versions,
> so it's a simple matter to revert the vandalism... less work than the
> vandalism itself. Is the same true for bugzilla?
Yes, simply close or reopen bugs. Anyone can still submit bugs, so
it's not as if there wasn't already a ripe outlet for vandalism. I
don't see that opening up the rest of the system makes this worse..
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST