On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Patrick Mansfield wrote:
>
> > I don't see why we need the #define, or is that another patch?
>
>
>
> The define exists for the same reason that HAVE_xxx exists in
> include/linux/netdevice.h and other headers: a feature test macro, so
> code using this pointer can detect its presence or absence. The world
> of drivers is not all in the kernel tarball, ya know ;-)
>
> But as I said, the macro is misnamed, it should be
> HAVE_UPPER_PRIVATE_DATA or similar.
>
> Jeff
Hey Jeff!
Works for me, has each HBA has the need to reserve local structs and not
pollute the basic kernel w/ bloat!
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick, CTO & Founder
iSCSI Software Solutions Provider
http://www.PyXTechnologies.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST