Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 09:09:41 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Allow 2.5.48 IDE to compile w/o DMA"
In reply to: Neil Brown: "RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver"
Next in thread: Bill Rugolsky Jr.: "Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 04:09, Neil Brown wrote:
> u32 set_uuid[4]

Wouldnt u8 for the uuid avoid a lot of endian mess

> u32 ctime

Use some padding so you can go to 64bit times

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Allow 2.5.48 IDE to compile w/o DMA"
In reply to: Neil Brown: "RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver"
Next in thread: Bill Rugolsky Jr.: "Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST