Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:33:43 EST


On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:57, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> The double negative unwrapped:
>
> "Being a module doesnt make it not a derivative work."
>
> 'Being a module does (not) make it not a derivative work.'
> 'Being a module does (not) make it (not) a derivative work.'
>
> 'Being a module does make it a derivative work.'
>
> Is this the intent of the statement?

No

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST