Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 15:05:18 EST

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [CFT] Athlon testers needed."
Previous message: nick@snowman.net: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

make it ignore BK and/or SCCS files.

> open(FIND, "find . -name \*.[ch] |") || die "couldn't run find on *.[ch]\n";
> while ($f = <FIND>) {
> chop $f;
next if m|SCCS/s\.|;
next if m|BitKeeper/|;

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [CFT] Athlon testers needed."
Previous message: nick@snowman.net: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST