Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 15:49:33 EST

Next message: erich@uruk.org: "Re: PATCH: Recognize Tualatin cache size in 2.4.x"
Previous message: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-A1"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 19:55, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> So " -fno-inline " should be enough to squelch the extremists?

Its not relevant to the discussion even.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: erich@uruk.org: "Re: PATCH: Recognize Tualatin cache size in 2.4.x"
Previous message: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-A1"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST