Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 16:15:34 EST


On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 20:41, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Have we decided that #include'ing GPL'd code does, or does not, taint
> otherwise "license-clean" code that includes the GPL'd code?

Ask a lawyer - and the answer mostly is "it depends"

> we fall to copyright law, and wonder aloud if an obviously-non-derived
> work #includes GPL'd code, does it become derived?

Example 1

        I paste your name and address into my document does it become
        a derived work

Example 2

        I paste your poem into my document does it become a derived work

So #include isnt terribly relevant 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST