> We can kill i_dev.
> BTW, watch out for socket.c use of ->i_dev.
Yes, I looked at that but concluded that someone (you?)
had added the assignment just to preserve the guarantee
previously given by get_empty_inode() at the moment it
was replaced by new_inode(). But it is superfluous, I think.
> However, rdev and [cb]dev will have to remain separate.
We can fight later on that one. My point of view is
that just like i_dev is a field in i_sb, also i_rdev
can be retrieved from i_[cb]dev.
Something else is kdev_t. I liked it when it was a pointer.
Now it is just garbage and the kernel is full of conversions
to and from. Is there any reason not to throw out all of kdev_t?
That is, is there a reason to have a kdev_t different from dev_t?
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:35 EST