Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 09:00:09 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer"
Previous message: Shawn Starr: "[WISH][2.5] ALSA and C-Media sound cards"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > OK, got it back to 119000. Each signal was calling copy_*_user 24 times.
> > This gets it down to six.
> Also maybe we can do something about that multiple memcpy in copy_fpu_fxsave()
> In fact, that looks a bit fishy. We copy 10 bytes each memcpy, but
> advance the to ptr 5 bytes each iteration. What gives here ?

<morning caffiene kicks in>
Doh, of course.. it's copying shorts. Still looks icky though IMO.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer"
Previous message: Shawn Starr: "[WISH][2.5] ALSA and C-Media sound cards"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST