[BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-rc2-aa1 with contest

From: Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Date: Fri Nov 22 2002 - 17:29:22 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here is a partial run of contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks for
rc2aa1 with the disk latency hack

noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [5] 71.7 93 0 0 0.98
2.4.19 [5] 69.0 97 0 0 0.94
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 72.2 93 0 0 0.99
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1] 71.9 94 0 0 0.98
2420rc2aa1 [1] 71.1 94 0 0 0.97

cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [2] 66.6 99 0 0 0.91
2.4.19 [2] 68.0 99 0 0 0.93
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 67.2 99 0 0 0.92
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1] 67.4 99 0 0 0.92
2420rc2aa1 [1] 66.6 99 0 0 0.91

process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 109.5 57 119 44 1.50
2.4.19 [3] 106.5 59 112 43 1.45
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 110.7 58 119 43 1.51
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [3] 110.5 58 117 43 1.51*
2420rc2aa1 [1] 212.5 31 412 69 2.90*

This load just copies data between 4 processes repeatedly. Seems to take
longer.

ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 117.4 63 1 7 1.60
2.4.19 [2] 106.5 70 1 8 1.45
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 102.1 72 1 7 1.39
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [3] 107.1 69 1 7 1.46
2420rc2aa1 [1] 103.3 73 1 8 1.41

xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 150.8 49 2 8 2.06
2.4.19 [1] 132.4 55 2 9 1.81
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 180.7 40 3 8 2.47
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [3] 166.6 44 2 7 2.28*
2420rc2aa1 [1] 217.7 34 4 9 2.97*

Takes longer. Is only one run though so may not be an accurate average.

io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 474.1 15 36 10 6.48
2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 6.73
2.4.20-rc1 [2] 1142.2 6 90 10 15.60
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1] 1132.5 6 90 10 15.47
2420rc2aa1 [1] 164.3 44 10 9 2.24

This was where the effect of the disk latency hack was expected to have an
effect. It sure did.

read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 102.3 70 6 3 1.40
2.4.19 [2] 134.1 54 14 5 1.83
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 173.2 43 20 5 2.37
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [3] 150.6 51 16 5 2.06
2420rc2aa1 [1] 140.5 51 13 4 1.92

list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 90.2 76 1 17 1.23
2.4.19 [1] 89.8 77 1 20 1.23
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 88.8 77 0 12 1.21
2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1] 88.1 78 1 16 1.20
2420rc2aa1 [1] 99.7 69 1 19 1.36

mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 103.3 70 32 3 1.41
2.4.19 [3] 100.0 72 33 3 1.37
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 105.9 69 32 2 1.45

Mem load hung the machine. I could not get rc2aa1 through this part of the
benchmark no matter how many times I tried to run it. No idea what was going
on. Easy to reproduce. Simply run the mem_load out of contest (which runs
until it is killed) and the machine will hang.

Con

P.S. I'm having mailserver trouble so respond to lkml where I may see
responses
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE93q/IF6dfvkL3i1gRAqWCAKCp6eZ2MFe4Ag7LqoGwy4+0MbUqxQCgkkxl
AOUDUScNazCAJ2oZrdgDMuE=
=vHmI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:41 EST