Re: [Benchmark] AIM results

From: Paolo Ciarrocchi (ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org)
Date: Mon Nov 25 2002 - 06:41:24 EST

Next message: David Zaffiro: "Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer"
Previous message: Alex Riesen: "Re: 2.5.48+bk: piix: undefined references"
Maybe in reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "[Benchmark] AIM results"
Next in thread: Timothy D. Witham: "Re: [Benchmark] AIM results"
Reply: Timothy D. Witham: "Re: [Benchmark] AIM results"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
> Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I've ran the AIM benchmark against 2.4.19 and 2.5.49 on my laptop (PIII@800 Reiserfs)
>
> AIM9, I assume.

Yes

> It's a rather dumb benchmark, but fun. Lots of really tiny
> microbenchmarks, easy to see what's going on.

I can run it for every 2.5.* linus will release.
Do you think it is a good idea or just a waste of time ?

Paolo

-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with POP3/IMAP access for only US$19.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Zaffiro: "Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer"
Previous message: Alex Riesen: "Re: 2.5.48+bk: piix: undefined references"
Maybe in reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "[Benchmark] AIM results"
Next in thread: Timothy D. Witham: "Re: [Benchmark] AIM results"
Reply: Timothy D. Witham: "Re: [Benchmark] AIM results"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:10 EST