[Please CC me replies as I'm not on the list]
Le mar 26/11/2002 à 14:41, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> In fact I've been cleaning up a bit the 2.4 version before
> submitting it -- the entries for other VIA chips are a bit
> more convoluted and I suspect the first patch is not as
> complete as it should be. In fact I think I'll post a 2.5
> followup soon.
>
> Please do not apply the first patch and use this one instead.
Which was webmail-borked. Sorry, should not have let the other
submission rush me.
Anyway here is a cleaned-up tested version for 2.4.20-rc4. It's
basically a straight port of the 2.5 patch, plus the dri bits I missed
in 2.5 (purely cosmetic, but hey not having his dmesg full of unknown
chips is always nice), plus some kt400-related pci ids for the database.
The effect is the same as the patch that went in 2.5, with a few nicer
printks.
Please apply
-- Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:15 EST