Re: data corrupting bug in 2.4.20 ext3, data=journal

• Next message: Tim Connors: "Re: small memory machine, large reserved memory"
• Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"
• In reply to: Andrew Morton: "data corrupting bug in 2.4.20 ext3, data=journal"
• Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: data corrupting bug in 2.4.20 ext3, data=journal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ...
> The fix is to only apply the optimisation to inodes which are operating
> under data=ordered.
>

That "fix" didn't fix it. Sorry about that.

Please avoid ext3/data=journal until it is sorted out.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Tim Connors: "Re: small memory machine, large reserved memory"
• Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"
• In reply to: Andrew Morton: "data corrupting bug in 2.4.20 ext3, data=journal"
• Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: data corrupting bug in 2.4.20 ext3, data=journal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:10 EST