Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

From: Olaf Dietsche (olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de)
Date: Sun Dec 01 2002 - 13:46:02 EST


James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au> writes:

> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>> > > VERIFY_STRUCT(struct security_operations, ops, err);
>> >
>> > This shouldn't be necessary anymore.
>>
>> Good point, I'll remove it. It was a hack anyway :)
>>
>
> I think we still want to make sure that the module author has explicitly
> accounted for all of the hooks, in case new hooks are added.

VERIFY_STRUCT() now verifies, wether security_fixup_ops() has done its
job. So it does no harm, but it is useless, nevertheless.

If you want to check, wether a module has been recompiled, you should
add a length/sizeof(struct security_operations) parameter.

Regards, Olaf.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:11 EST