Re: [PATCH] rmap15a incremental diff against 2.4.20-ac1

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 07:50:03 EST


On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Javier Marcet wrote:

> There was no inconsistency but in three spots.

Your changes look good. Maybe the lookup_swapcache() thing would
be more beautiful, but it's equivalent to the code you've got in
place. Your patch should just work.

> Feel free to try it. I'm running it right now and so far no problems.
> The vm usage has definitely improved, but there are still slight stalls
> when there's a high disk io. Say, in periods of ~2-3s the system stopped
> responding for a few cents of a sec, as if it had tachycardia.

That's probably the disk IO scheduler.

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST