On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:47:28PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Ingo vetoed it.
> >
> > I wasnt aware Ingo had a veto
>
> It's not exactly considered nice to merge code against the intention
> of it's author. (which doesn't mean it's impossible, of course)
Ingo did explicitly mention he thought the O(1) scheduler was not 2.4
material. Whether this has changed, e.g. due to stabilization of the
scheduler, I do not know. But I do recall he had an opinion in the
past.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST