Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

From: Dragan Stancevic (visitor@xalien.org)
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 10:14:08 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] tiglusb"
Previous message: Harald Welte: "Re: 2.4.20-rc4 netfilter_ipv4 circular dependency"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tuesday 03 December 2002 08:01, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:37:52PM -0800, Dragan Stancevic wrote:
> > not that I am trying to be a PITA but where did you get the information
> > that initialized variables live in .bss?
>
> I was incorrect, as was pointed out to me about 15 minutes after sending
> that email :)

Oh sorry, I didn't catch that, 13000 emails unread.

-- 
Peace can only come as a natural consequence
of universal enlightenment. -Dr. Nikola Tesla
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] tiglusb"
Previous message: Harald Welte: "Re: 2.4.20-rc4 netfilter_ipv4 circular dependency"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:16 EST