H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
>>
>> kprintf would be better
>
> >
>
> Why? We don't have, say, kstrcpy() or ksscanf() for other functions
> that are library-equivalent.
k to remember people that it is not the std function, thus not a write to
the standard output. I see more like fprintf (file) and [v]sprintf (string),
we write to a special buffer ("klog").
But if we don't move the verbosity level out of string, also the simple
'printf' would be fine.
ciao
giacomo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:17 EST