>> please try with my tree.
>
> It is greatly improved. It is still not as smooth as the standard 2.4
> scheduler, but I'd characterise it as "a bit jerky" rather than "makes
> me want to punch a hole in the monitor".
>
> The difference is unlikely to be noticed by many. (But it should be
> _better_ than stock 2.4)
...
>> can you reproduce with my tree?
>
> Again, hugely improved over normal O(1) behaviour, but not as responsive
> as the stock 2.4 scheduler.
Andrea, which patches in your tree are the ones that fix this?
If it's the big-monster one ... any chance you could split out
the bits actually fix it? I'd love to be able to apply your fixes
to 2.5 and try them there ....
Thanks,
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 22:00:17 EST